Jeenie - Compare Jamal with Haley and Marita
Compare Jamal with Haley and Marita
When comparing to having intention of plagiarism among Haley, Marita, and Jamal cases, we can find that Jamal case is very different to the other ones.
Since Jamal did not have the intention which commit plagiarism at all. Also, he turned in his paper not to know his rewrite something which published. Though Jamal broke their promise which anything we wrote in William’s house would stay in, Jamal may reveal his effort in writing. Above all, there is a problem that Robert Crasford is narrow-minded and unfair not to recognize and develop Jamal’s writing talent but to have race prejudice.
Haley had the intention of academic plagiarism even if she knew enough academic integrity and was senior student. Therefore, it is fair to receive academic probation as like expel. However, Marita did not have the intention of commit plagiarism in her first assignments and she did not know how to report reference sources in her paper. Thus, a disciplinary committee have to provide another opportunity for Marita. Also, Jamal committed plagiarism even though he is not intentional. However, Jamal have a remarkable gift or ability which express his own words and he is 16 age. Therefore, I think that this institution have to take proper decision and give Jamal an opportunity to write.
When comparing to having intention of plagiarism among Haley, Marita, and Jamal cases, we can find that Jamal case is very different to the other ones.
Since Jamal did not have the intention which commit plagiarism at all. Also, he turned in his paper not to know his rewrite something which published. Though Jamal broke their promise which anything we wrote in William’s house would stay in, Jamal may reveal his effort in writing. Above all, there is a problem that Robert Crasford is narrow-minded and unfair not to recognize and develop Jamal’s writing talent but to have race prejudice.
Haley had the intention of academic plagiarism even if she knew enough academic integrity and was senior student. Therefore, it is fair to receive academic probation as like expel. However, Marita did not have the intention of commit plagiarism in her first assignments and she did not know how to report reference sources in her paper. Thus, a disciplinary committee have to provide another opportunity for Marita. Also, Jamal committed plagiarism even though he is not intentional. However, Jamal have a remarkable gift or ability which express his own words and he is 16 age. Therefore, I think that this institution have to take proper decision and give Jamal an opportunity to write.
posted by cherepaha at 1:01 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home